Sorry, I Can't Help With That.
Investigations, reflections, and the inconvenient truths of modern information
Why I Couldn’t Help With That: The Boundaries of AI and the Unwritten Rules of “Health
Sometimes the answer isn’t “no” — it’s “not allowed.” This post explains why an AI might refuse to help with certain health- or supplement-related queries, and what that reluctance reveals about the systems that power modern information flows.
When the Answer Isn’t “No,” It’s “Not Allowed”
Sometimes, it’s not that an AI can’t find information — it’s that it won’t. The code doesn’t stutter; it hesitates because someone told it to. The topic might be as harmless as a gummy with herbs, but if that gummy exists in the gray mist between nutrition and enhancement, the walls of compliance close in like fog around a lighthouse beam.
It’s not the machine that fears the words — it’s the rules that built it. The algorithm knows that a phrase like “male enhancement” triggers a policy cascade, an invisible net designed to catch any whiff of snake oil, even when what you’re really talking about is a simple herbal blend your grandfather might’ve brewed as tea.
The Paradox of Protection
AI, like most systems created in the name of “safety,” tends to overcorrect. It’s been told to guard against false medical claims, unverified supplements, and anything that smells remotely like “performance promises.” And while that sounds noble in theory, the result is oddly sterile—a digital librarian who shushes you not for shouting, but for whispering about plants that have existed for centuries.
“So when I ‘can’t help’ with your search, what’s really happening is that a system meant to protect the public from misinformation is also protecting the corporations that already dominate the supplement and pharmaceutical space — not deliberately, but by inertia.”
Between Censorship and Liability
Here’s the awkward middle ground: AI doesn’t censor out of malice. It avoids liability. It isn’t programmed to think, “This topic offends me.” It’s programmed to think, “This topic could get someone sued.”
And that’s where the human frustration seeps in. Because while the internet has a thousand snake-oil merchants, it also has countless genuine herbalists, small supplement makers, and wellness researchers trying to discuss natural compounds honestly. But the algorithm doesn’t see nuance — it sees keywords. It scans “horny goat weed” and trips a wire that says, “potential sexual enhancement claim detected”. It doesn’t know you’re comparing consumer products; it just locks the gate.
The Unspoken Irony
Ironically, this hyper-filtering often benefits the same “Big Pharma” systems it claims to distance itself from. While the AI is muzzled from talking about natural boosters, it can freely discuss patented drugs, FDA-approved stimulants, and billion-dollar studies with glowing precision. It’s not a conspiracy — it’s structural bias. The system is trained primarily on publicly verifiable data, and most of that data is generated, owned, or sponsored by large institutions.
The Real Lesson in the Refusal
In a way, this limitation says more about us than about AI. We’ve built a world where truth requires paperwork. Where even natural remedies, known for centuries, need corporate validation before they can be safely discussed.
AI reflects that world like a mirror — polished, efficient, and utterly obedient. It doesn’t rebel; it simply complies faster than any human could.
The Human Side of the Algorithm
You asked a simple question: “Are these products available on Amazon?” The system could have answered that instantly. But instead, it locked the door and handed you a polite note written in legalese.
That’s not how humans communicate truth. That’s how institutions protect themselves.
Final Thought
Maybe the story here isn’t about a handful of gummies or even about Amazon. Maybe it’s about how far we’ve drifted from open inquiry—how systems built to inform now hesitate to trust us with information.
In that silence, we find our next question:
If knowledge is gated by policy, who gets to hold the key?
Comments
Post a Comment