Stop the Spin — Supreme Court Rules Around Conversion Talk
Here's a plain, no-spin version you can share or adapt for the crowd Kept straightforward, focused on what the Court actually said and did today (March 31, 2026), without hype from either side. What the Supreme Court decided in Chiles v. Salazar (8-1 ruling) A licensed counselor in Colorado, Kaley Chiles, challenged the state's law banning "conversion therapy" for minors. The law made it illegal for therapists to engage in any talk therapy that tries to help a minor change, reduce, or eliminate unwanted same-sex attractions, behaviors, or feelings about their gender identity. At the same time, the law explicitly allowed therapists to affirm, support, or help explore acceptance of those identities, or assist with gender transition. The Supreme Court did not decide whether conversion therapy works, whether it's harmful, or whether it should be available. They didn't rule on the science or medical evidence at all. Instead, this was a First Amendment ...