Hurricane Erin — From A Tropical Storm To CATEGORY 5 In Just 24 Hours…

The Climate Game: WEF, BlackRock, and the Push for Control

Hurricane Erin’s jaw-dropping leap from tropical storm to Category 5 in just 24 hours in August 2025 has sparked another round of climate change debates. But behind the headlines about CO2, cow farts, and warming oceans, a growing chorus is asking: is the climate crisis being weaponized by global elites—think World Economic Forum (WEF), BlackRock, and their allies—to tighten their grip on the world? This blog post dives into the evidence, the players, and the nagging suspicion that the push for “saving the planet” might be more about control than carbon.

The Usual Suspects: CO2 and the Climate Narrative

We’re told CO2 is the villain behind storms like Erin. Human activity—fossil fuels, industry, deforestation—pumps out 35 billion metric tons of CO2 annually, dwarfing natural sources like volcanoes (150-260 million tons). Warmer oceans, fueled by this CO2-driven warming, supercharge hurricanes, making rapid intensification like Erin’s more likely. The science here is solid: CO2 traps heat, and global temperatures have risen 1.1°C since pre-industrial times, with models projecting worse if emissions aren’t slashed.

But the narrative gets murky when you follow the money and power. The WEF, BlackRock, and other global heavyweights are steering the climate agenda, and their fingerprints are everywhere—from net-zero policies to green investment funds. Are they saving the planet, or playing a bigger game?

The WEF and BlackRock: Who Really Owns the World?

The World Economic Forum, with its annual Davos gatherings, pushes a vision of “stakeholder capitalism” and the “Great Reset.” Their climate agenda calls for sweeping changes: carbon taxes, green energy mandates, and digital IDs tied to carbon footprints. Sounds noble, but critics on X and beyond argue it’s a blueprint for control, centralizing power in the hands of unelected elites. A 2024 X post summed it up: “WEF’s not saving the planet—they’re selling you a leash disguised as a solution.”

Then there’s BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, with $10 trillion in assets under management. They own stakes in nearly every major corporation—oil giants, tech firms, even green energy startups. BlackRock’s CEO, Larry Fink, is a WEF darling, pushing ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) investing, which pressures companies to align with climate goals. On paper, it’s about sustainability. In practice, it gives BlackRock leverage to shape corporate behavior globally. When BlackRock “encourages” net-zero compliance, companies listen—or risk losing access to capital.

This duo’s influence is staggering. BlackRock’s holdings touch 80% of the world’s top companies, and WEF’s network includes governments, NGOs, and billionaires like Bill Gates. Together, they shape policies that affect your gas prices, your job, and even what you’re allowed to say about climate change.

The Silencing of Dissent: A Red Flag

If the climate crisis is so clear-cut, why the need to silence dissent? Scientists like Judith Curry and Richard Lindzen, who question the scale of CO2’s impact or the reliability of climate models, aren’t flat-out debunked but face career sabotage. Curry’s been smeared as a “denier” despite her peer-reviewed work on natural variability. Lindzen’s low-sensitivity arguments (suggesting 1-2°C warming per CO2 doubling vs. IPCC’s 2-4.5°C) remain in play, with cloud feedback studies still inconclusive. Yet both have been sidelined, with journals rejecting their papers and funding drying up.

X posts from 2024-2025 highlight this censorship, with users sharing stories of suppressed studies or deplatformed researchers. One user wrote, “If the science is settled, why are they so scared of a few skeptics?” The push to silence isn’t about truth—it’s about narrative control. When BlackRock and WEF back a “consensus,” dissent threatens their trillion-dollar green empire.

Historical CO2: A Convenient Omission

Here’s another wrinkle: CO2 levels were higher millions of years ago—1,000-2,000 ppm in the Eocene, vs. 420 ppm today. Earth thrived with no ice caps and lush ecosystems. The catch? Those changes unfolded over millennia, not decades. Today’s rapid CO2 spike is human-driven, but the narrative rarely mentions that natural cycles once dwarfed our output. Why? Because admitting Earth’s resilience might weaken the urgency to overhaul society under WEF’s “Great Reset” or BlackRock’s ESG mandates.

The Elite Footprint: Gates and Hypocrisy

Take Bill Gates, a WEF regular. His private jet burned 1,600 tons of CO2 in 2021—100 times the average American’s footprint. Yet he’s a climate crusader, funneling billions into green tech via Breakthrough Energy. It’s not just Gates—billionaires collectively emit about 1 billion tons of CO2 annually, a fraction of the 35 billion from industry and transport. But their outsized influence shapes policies that hit the average person hardest—think carbon taxes raising your fuel costs while elites jet to Davos.

The Real Game: Power, Not Planet

Here’s the rub: the climate crisis is real, but the solutions often smell like a power grab. WEF’s push for digital carbon tracking could morph into social credit systems. BlackRock’s ESG mandates give them sway over entire economies. Meanwhile, the focus on CO2 distracts from practical fixes—resilient infrastructure, better forecasting, or nuclear energy, which dissenters like Curry advocate but get ignored.

Hurricane Erin isn’t just a storm—it’s a wake-up call. The climate is changing, but so is the game of who controls your life. The WEF and BlackRock aren’t saving the planet; they’re reshaping it to their advantage, using CO2 as the excuse. The question is, will we let them?

What’s Next?

Stop swallowing the narrative whole. Dig into the science, question the players, and demand solutions that don’t trade your freedom for their power. What do you think—how do we push back against elite overreach while tackling real environmental challenges? Drop your thoughts below!