You Can't Say That!

Silenced in the Digital Age: How Big Tech Muzzles Truth and Echoes Washington's Warning

“If men are to be precluded from offering their sentiments on a matter which may involve the most serious and alarming consequences... reason is of no use to us; the freedom of speech may be taken away, and dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.”
— George Washington, 1783

A Voice Stifled: My Story and Yours

Imagine this: you share a post about vitamin D boosting immune health or question the rushed rollout of an experimental vaccine, only to find your account suspended, your words erased, your voice muzzled. That’s my story, and maybe it’s yours too. During the COVID-19 pandemic, I was silenced for daring to highlight the science-backed benefits of vitamin D and the risks of what was, at the time, an Emergency Use Authorized (EUA) mRNA vaccine. This isn’t just personal—it’s a global pattern, one that George Washington warned about over two centuries ago when he spoke of the dangers of suppressing free speech. Today, Big Tech and government pressures are turning digital platforms into slaughterhouses of dissent, where reason is buried under algorithms and agendas.

The Modern Muzzle: Censorship in the Digital Town Square

Washington’s 1783 address to his officers was a plea to protect open discourse during a crisis. Fast forward to 2025, and social media—our modern public square—has become a battleground. Governments and platforms worldwide are cracking down on “misinformation,” but the net is cast wide, snaring not just falsehoods but inconvenient truths. In 2024 alone, 296 internet shutdowns across 39 countries cost $8.9 billion, often targeting platforms during protests or elections. My posts about vitamin D’s role in immunity or the experimental nature of early COVID vaccines were flagged, shadowbanned, or deleted, despite being grounded in peer-reviewed science. Why? Because they challenged the narrative that vaccines were the sole solution.

The Science They Didn’t Want You to See

Let’s set the record straight. Vitamin D isn’t snake oil—it’s a critical immunomodulator. Studies show deficiency (below 20 ng/mL) increases COVID hospitalization risk by up to 2.5 times. A 2022 analysis estimated that supplementation could have saved 116,000 U.S. lives early in the pandemic. Yet, posts like mine were labeled “harmful,” lumped with quack cures to protect the vaccine-only mantra. Similarly, calling mRNA vaccines “experimental” was accurate—they launched under EUA, bypassing years of standard testing. Reports of side effects, like myocarditis in young men (10x higher post-vaccination), were buried, with platforms like Facebook removing 20 million COVID-related posts in 2021 alone. Mark Zuckerberg later admitted the Biden administration pressured Meta to censor content, including health discussions, to align with official messaging.

A Global Chill: Stories of the Silenced

I’m not alone. Across platforms like X, users share chilling tales of censorship:

• 2020, Facebook: A user banned for posting that vitamin D helps with respiratory health, despite no other claims.
• 2022, YouTube: Lectures on vitamin D’s antiviral properties wiped, with entire playlists deleted.
• 2025, X: Threads on vaccine injuries throttled mid-creation, visibility slashed by algorithms.

From China’s Great Firewall punishing posts with social credit deductions to the UK’s Online Safety Act jailing users for “offensive” tweets, the pattern is clear: silence dissent, control the narrative. Even democracies like Australia and the EU fine platforms for “disinfo,” forcing preemptive takedowns. The result? A digital silence where reason—Washington’s cornerstone of liberty—gets drowned out.

The Cost of Silence: A Digital Slaughter

Washington warned that muting voices invites “alarming consequences.” In the pandemic, censorship delayed access to life-saving knowledge. Vitamin D’s benefits were ridiculed until 2023, when mainstream outlets quietly backtracked. Vaccine side-effect discussions were stifled, eroding trust as injuries mounted. Globally, shutdowns in places like Iran and Myanmar crushed dissent, enabling state violence. The stakes are real: when speech is taken away, we’re led, as Washington said, “like sheep to the slaughter”—vulnerable to unchecked power, be it from governments or Big Pharma.

Fighting Back: Reclaiming Our Voice

So, what now? Washington didn’t just lament—he urged action. Today, that means resisting the muzzle. Platforms like X, with looser moderation, are becoming refuges for free speech. Tools like VPNs and decentralized networks (e.g., Mastodon) bypass blocks. Legal battles are heating up—2025 lawsuits against Meta and Google cite First Amendment violations. And voices like RFK Jr.’s are pushing for transparency on suppressed health data. My ban for sharing vitamin D truths only strengthened my resolve to speak louder.

This is our fight. If you’ve been silenced—whether for health posts or other truths—share your story. Comment below, join the conversation on X, or support platforms that don’t bow to pressure. Reason is our weapon, and we won’t be led silently. Let’s honor Washington by keeping the digital square open, unapologetic, and alive with truth.

Join the Conversation on X

Posted on October 5, 2025 | Share your censorship story in the comments below!