Moore Tornadoes? New developments?

Tornadoes and Smart City Concerns in Moore, Oklahoma

June 1, 2025

Moore’s Tornado History: A Vulnerable City

Moore, Oklahoma, in Tornado Alley, has been struck by eight significant tornadoes (F3/EF3 or stronger) since 1957, including two catastrophic F5/EF5 events in 1999 and 2013. These storms caused billions in damages and dozens of deaths, making Moore a focal point for disaster resilience efforts.

• 1999 F5: Winds up to 321 mph, $1.1 billion in damage, 36 deaths.
• 2013 EF5: Winds 200–210 mph, $2 billion in damage, 24 deaths.
• Other events: F3+ tornadoes in 1957, 1995, 1998, 2003, 2010, and 2024.

Moore’s flat terrain and location where Gulf and continental air masses collide make it prone to violent storms. With only 5% of U.S. tornadoes reaching EF3+, Moore’s frequency—one every 8–9 years—is a statistical outlier for a 22-square-mile city.

Smart City Projects: Resilience or Hidden Agendas?

Moore’s tornadoes have driven smart city and energy projects, like advanced warning systems, storm shelters, and smart grids, to enhance safety and recovery. However, concerns about corporate influence, 5G risks, and surveillance evoke fears of a dystopian future, reminiscent of Orwell’s 1984. Below, we examine these issues critically.

BlackRock’s Potential Influence

Some speculate that powerful firms like BlackRock, a major investor in infrastructure and technology, could influence weather-related projects for profit. For example, posts on X have linked BlackRock to land grabs following natural disasters, like flooding in North Carolina tied to lithium mining interests. While no direct evidence connects BlackRock to Moore’s projects, its investments in Chinese surveillance firms raise questions about its role in smart city tech globally. Residents deserve transparency about corporate involvement in local initiatives to dispel fears of exploitation.

[](https://prospect.org/economy/blackrock-invest-blacklisted-chinese-surveillance-companies/)

5G Technology: Safety and Interference Concerns

Smart city systems, including those in Moore, may integrate 5G for real-time data and disaster response. However, 5G’s higher frequencies (e.g., 24 GHz) could interfere with weather satellites, potentially degrading forecasts critical for tornado-prone areas. Meteorologists have warned that 5G signals could compromise water vapor measurements, risking less accurate predictions. Additionally, public concerns about 5G’s health impacts—such as electromagnetic radiation—persist, though the WHO states no proven adverse effects exist below regulatory limits. These issues demand rigorous oversight to ensure safety and reliability.

[](https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/may/04/5g-mobile-networks-threat-to-world-weather-forecasting)[](https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-03609-x)[](https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/radiation-5g-mobile-networks-and-health)

1984-Style Surveillance Fears

Smart city technologies, like IoT sensors and smart meters, raise fears of mass surveillance akin to Orwell’s 1984. Moore’s 44 warning sirens and potential expansions (e.g., traffic cameras) could evolve into systems tracking personal data, echoing concerns about government overreach. Modern surveillance capabilities far exceed Orwell’s imagination, with routine data collection by agencies like the NSA. While Moore’s projects focus on safety, lack of transparent data governance could erode trust, especially if private firms or governments misuse data for control or profit.

[](https://www.newyorker.com/books/page-turner/so-are-we-living-in-1984)[](https://www.techpolicy.press/ecosurveillance-risks-personal-privacy-and-climate-action/)

Other Concerns

• Economic Burdens: Upgraded building codes and shelters add costs ($1,000–$2,000 per home), potentially excluding lower-income residents and fueling suspicions of gentrification.
• Corporate Control: Partnerships with utilities like OG&E for smart grids raise fears of rate hikes or corporate dominance, especially if decision-making lacks community input.
• Disaster Profiteering: Federal funds (e.g., $2 billion post-2013) could be mismanaged, with concerns about favoritism in contracts, though no clear evidence exists in Moore.

Critical Perspective

Moore’s smart city projects aim to save lives and reduce tornado impacts, but concerns about BlackRock’s influence, 5G risks, and surveillance are not baseless. Corporate agendas, unaddressed 5G interference, and opaque data practices could undermine public trust. While conspiracy theories (e.g., weather manipulation) lack evidence, the power of firms like BlackRock and the surveillance potential of smart tech warrant scrutiny. Transparent governance and equitable policies are essential to balance resilience with resident concerns.

Conclusion

Moore’s exceptional tornado frequency demands innovative solutions, but smart city projects must address legitimate fears about corporate influence, 5G risks, and surveillance. Without clear communication and robust safeguards, these initiatives risk alienating residents. For more details or real-time perspectives, contact Grok or check local updates..... OR IS IT MORE SINISTER THAN THAT 🤔